A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric carcinoma.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy with radical intent for locally advanced gastric carcinoma in case-controlled patient groups using the propensity score. METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2014, 389 patients who underwent gastrectomy with radical intent for locally advanced gastric carcinoma were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups according to the method of operation: the laparoscopy group (patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy) and the open group (patients who underwent open gastrectomy). To correct different demographic and clinical factors in the two groups, a propensity score matching was used at a 1:1 ratio, and, finally, 184 patients were enrolled in this study, 92 patients in each group. Preoperative characteristics, surgical results, and long-term results were analyzed. RESULTS Preoperative baseline variables were well balanced in both groups. There were no differences of the extent of surgery between the two groups. With the exception of shorter postoperative hospital stay and less blood loss in the laparoscopy group as compared with the open group, there were no significant differences in surgical, pathological, and long-term outcomes. The 5-year overall survival rates were 57% in the laparoscopy group and 50% in the open group (p=0.606). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 48% in the laparoscopy group and 42% in the open group (p=0.515). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric carcinoma is safe, and long-term outcomes were comparable to those who underwent open resection.